このカテゴリには、現在表示できる掲示板がありません。

Let’s enjoy English

今日2
昨日1
ROM0
合計370
レス移動
No.1 燻し銀蔵 MDc4NGNh
2026-04-17 07:02:15
報告
I’m going to start a new thread here from now on. I hope it goes well, though I’m afraid it won’t.

I have to go for a work at once, so see you again.

あずきちゃん、ここだよ
返信 編集 削除 スレッド設定
共感 3
No.2 あずき ZWE3NTZk 書禁
2026-04-17 11:24:28
報告
銀三さん、お邪魔します。

わ〜、またお会い出来ましたね。

こちらは英語スレなので、他にスレ立てましょうか。

上手く出来るかな?また来ますね。

(^_^)/~
返信 編集 削除
共感 1
No.3 燻し銀蔵 MDc4NGNh 書禁
2026-04-17 22:31:53
報告
いちいち名前を記入しなければならないのがめんどくさいねorz

5000文字は凄いねΣ੧(❛□❛✿)

他にスレを立てても、ここはミクルじゃないから色々難しそうだね(>人<;)

絵文字じゃなkて、顔文字だと意味もいまいち分からないし….
返信 編集 削除
共感 1
No.4 あずき ZWE3NTZk 書禁
2026-04-17 22:58:10
報告
>>3
こんばんは。(^^)

5000文字はスゴいですね。英語のレスは、もう少し少ない文字数で次に移られるのかな?😉

毎回、本名が出るのでビックリしますね💧😅
絵文字、出てないかな?🤔❓

すぐにスレ立てが出来なくてすみません。🙏

...もっと見る
返信 編集 削除
共感 1
No.5 燻し銀三 YzIyZTY2 書禁
2026-04-18 02:26:38
報告
絵文字出てるよ👍

でも、5000文字目一杯使ってレスする事を考えると、英語のレスは2回で精一杯かも😓

3れすの途中で力尽きると思う...😓
返信 編集 削除
共感 1
No.6 あずき MTk4MDc2 書禁
2026-04-18 03:17:47
報告
>>5
まだ起きてました。😄

絵文字、出てますね。ここ、まだログイン出来てない状態で、銀三さんにレス書いてます。

ちゃんとログインしたほうが、イラストとか載せられるのかな?(解らないでレスしている💧)😅

私は英語の事は解らないですが、5000文字目一杯書かれたら、後で読み返される時も大変かと思いました。

あるところから、「続きを見る」みたいになる様ですし。
...もっと見る
返信 編集 削除
共感 1
No.7 燻し銀蔵 YTM3ZGYw 書禁
2026-04-19 05:02:23
報告
5000文字きっちり書いて投稿したのに、ここに表示されない。😱

何てこった😮‍💨

やっぱ、もう少し字数を減らした方が良いのかな?😂
返信 編集 削除
共感 3
No.8 あずき N2FhY2Iy 書禁
2026-04-19 06:38:12
報告
>>7
おはようございます。☀

えっ⁉5000文字も入力なさって載らないのはショックですね💧😳

英語だけだから、とかかな?日本語も入れてみては? なんて、それでもダメだったらアドバイスにならないですね、申し訳ないです💧🙏

8時には出かけます。夜、スレ立てられたらやってみますね。

では、良い日曜日をお過ごし下さいませ。😉✨
...もっと見る
返信 編集 削除
共感 2
No.9 燻し銀蔵 YTM3ZGYw 書禁
2026-04-19 07:15:38
報告
>>8

おはよう御座います😊

ありがとう。日本語と英語で書いたけど無理だった😔

今度は、文字数を1000字くらいにしてやってみる。👍

良い日曜日を過ごしてね😄

...もっと見る
返信 編集 削除
共感 2
No.10 燻し銀蔵 YTM3ZGYw 書禁
2026-04-19 07:33:07
報告
【What does it mean?】

《Can the self defense force transport the nuclear weapon as well?》

Though being unable to transport the weapons as usual, we can offer the ammunition from this time, and we can supply oil and maintain to the aircraft in other nation preparing for flying so as to carry out the combat operation.

The thing being taken up at the National Assembly is the next things..

As being able to supply the ammunition, can we supply the nuclear weapon to other nation?

...もっと見る
返信 編集 削除
共感 2
No.11 燻し銀蔵 YTM3ZGYw 書禁
2026-04-19 08:01:02
報告
【What are the security legislations?】

But the Ministry of Defense answered in odd way, so we all the Japanese were worried about, perhaps…

【The security bills and China. How should we handle threat from China?】

《Why didn’t we add the threat from China to the explanation?》

The government could have understood the story of laying the maritime mine on the Straight of Hormuz was unrealistic, though it has broken out actually, though I don’t know its background and circumstance at all.

...もっと見る
返信 編集 削除
共感 2
No.12 あずき N2FhY2Iy 書禁
2026-04-19 08:16:36
報告
わー、載りましたね❗

(少し遅れて出る事になり、これ書いたら出ます)

銀三さんがコツコツ頑張ってらっしゃるのが、こちらに伝わったのでしょう。😉

もともとミクルが閉鎖されて路頭に迷ってる人たちのために作って下さったところ、ですよね。

ここ、親切な掲示板ですね。(*^^*)

...もっと見る
返信 編集 削除
共感 1
No.13 燻し銀蔵 YTM3ZGYw 書禁
2026-04-19 10:45:54
報告
【The security legislations and China. How should we handle the threat from China?】

《Why didn’t we add the threat from China to the explanation?》

…and trying to construct the runway on the other two reefs likewise. It seems that the surveillance radar and mobile cannon are deployed in the part of the reefs, so it’s obvious its aim is the military use, moreover China itself has said it meets the indispensable needs on the military defense.

According to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea 国連海洋法条約, the reef sinking under the water in the full tide isn’t admitted at the island, as a result, even if having reclaimed the reef like that, it would become the island anything but, so no one can establish the territorial sea with the artificial island being reclaimed like that, but China has insisted that around the area belongs to China.

Roughly speaking, there are two problems.

...もっと見る
返信 編集 削除
共感 3
No.14 燻し銀蔵 YTM3ZGYw 書禁
2026-04-19 16:16:02
報告
【The security bills and China. How should we deal with the threat from China?】

《Why didn’t we add the threat from China to the explanation?》

China has disputed against Philippine, Vietnam, Malaysia, Taiwan and Brunei. Does the area belong to which country? In the middle of the situation in which the belongingness was unclear, China went ahead with the landfill one-snidely, and there is the military facility, the harbor and the port, moreover some of the large scale of runways would be completed there, so the coastal nations are worried about it, especially the Mischief Reef used to be under effective control by Philippine, but it was taken away from Philippine by China by force, so it has been on edge.

There is one more thing.

There is the sea lane around there connecting between the East Asia and the Middle East, and tankers carrying the natural gas and petroleum always go and come from the Middle East to Japan around the clock. If it’s the high seas, it’s no problem, but….
返信 編集 削除
共感 2
No.15 燻し銀蔵 YTM3ZGYw 書禁
2026-04-19 16:33:17
報告
【The security bills and China. How should we handle the threat from China?】

…but as long as it belongs to China, there is fear no one can go and come there at will.

China has claimed that almost all of the South China Sea belonged to the its own territory from before, so if the 『island』belonged to China is completed here and there in the South China Sea, it may be possible China controls most of the South China Sea, being the those islands as base.

Needless to say, the coastal nations don’t hope to be controlled by China. As a result, the confrontation between the coastal nations of which concern become strong and China becomes serious.

Moreover America has thought the freedom of navigation in the South Chinas sea should be admitted and criticized the artificial islands made by China.

...もっと見る
返信 編集 削除
共感 2
No.16 燻し銀蔵 YTM3ZGYw 書禁
2026-04-19 17:02:38
報告
【The security legislation and China. How should we handle the threat from China?】

《America sent a warship around the artificial islands in the South China Sea》

America made the warship navigate at the area away from some 22km from the artificial island.

In fact, even if being in the territory belonged to other nation, the warship can navigate there. We call it the right of innocent passage. Without showing any hostility to the nation, putting up its flag and passes through there alone, the warship can do it.

If it’s a submarine, when going into there by diving, even if being attacked, no one can complain about it, but if emerging from the water and making clear its belongingness, the right of innocent passage is admitted.

...もっと見る
返信 編集 削除
共感 3
レス移動