このカテゴリには、現在表示できる掲示板がありません。

Let’s enjoy English

今日2
昨日1
ROM1
合計370
レス移動
No.1 燻し銀蔵 MDc4NGNh
2026-04-17 07:02:15
報告
I’m going to start a new thread here from now on. I hope it goes well, though I’m afraid it won’t.

I have to go for a work at once, so see you again.

あずきちゃん、ここだよ
返信 編集 削除 スレッド設定
共感 3
No.17 燻し銀蔵 YTM3ZGYw 書禁
2026-04-19 17:24:02
報告
【Security legislations and China. How should we deal with the threat from China?】

《America sent a warship around the artificial islands in the South China Sea》

The area belongs to China. It’s no change. America can said like that, but as long as there is the law like that, it means that the territorial sea belonged to China was denied by America.

It is said China sent two warships and and made them chase the warship belonged to America, but they were never close to the one belonged to America.

It’s just that America as well made the single warship alone navigate there, considering not to create tension between China and America.

...もっと見る
返信 編集 削除
共感 2
No.18 燻し銀蔵 YTM3ZGYw 書禁
2026-04-19 17:48:05
報告
【The security legislations and China. How should we handle the threat from China?】

《America sent a warship around the artificial islands in the South China Sea》

This time China controlled itself, but no one can predict what happens in the future. If thinking being lost its face, it is possible that the warship belonged to China may have taken into action blocking the way of America.

As a result there is the possibility that the military conflict happens in the South Chinas Sea from now on. Then if being laid the maritime mine in the South China Sea, the choice that the self defense force takes the field and get rid of the sea mine emerges.

If thinking like that, as to getting rid of the maritime mine, the one in the South Chinas Sea has more reality than the one in the Strait of Hormuz.

...もっと見る
返信 編集 削除
共感 3
No.19 燻し銀蔵 YTM3ZGYw 書禁
2026-04-19 18:09:51
報告
【The security bills and China. How should we handle the threat from China?】

《America sent a warship around the artificial island in the South China Sea》

Actually, the Abe Prime Minister hardly referred to the thing on China during the deliberation in the House of Councilors, starting to do bit by bit in the House of Representatives, for it’s related to that the relation between Japan and China is going to move to the improvement all of sudden.

When the Abe Prime Minister visited the Yasukuni shrine at the end of 2013, the relation between Japan and China was strained, and Mr. Abe didn’t seem he wanted to repeat it again, it is said he told China he would never visit the Yasukuni Shrine, by the intermediary of a person.

As China approaches Japan suddenly, it’s good timing for removing the South Korea, for it seemed that Mr. Abe thought, as to the South Korea, not handling it is the best option. As long as the relation between Japan and Chins improves, the South Korea approaches Japan for itself, so left the South Korea alone.
返信 編集 削除
共感 3
No.20 燻し銀蔵 YTM3ZGYw 書禁
2026-04-19 18:35:45
報告
【The security legislations and China. How should we handle the threat from China?】

No sooner had a meeting with Xi Jinping 習近平 who is the Chinese President by the strategy than the South Korea started to panic, so the summit meeting between Japan , China and the South Korea was held November.

As the relation between Japan and China improved, so Mr. Abe didn’t think he wanted to ruing the good atmosphere, so he seemed to abstain from saying stimulating China as extremely as he could.

《The scenario in which the self defense force fights against China in the South China Sea》

The relation between America and China is strained extremely.

...もっと見る
返信 編集 削除
共感 2
No.21 燻し銀蔵 YTM3ZGYw 書禁
2026-04-19 19:01:10
報告
【The security legislations and China. How should we handle the threat from China?】

《The scenario in which the self defense force fights against China in the South China Sea》

China seems to show off its power, so its action is very provocative. If both of America and
China take into action like that, unexpected situation could happen before long in the South China Sea, very dangerous situation is born then.

If the military force belonged to America and to China conflict, Japan will have to help America which is close relation with Japan. To say nothing of it, the relation between Japan and the South China Sea becomes deeper recently.

When patrolling the South China Sea, America has asked Japan to cooperate with America because of the financial difficulties partly.
...もっと見る
返信 編集 削除
共感 2
No.22 燻し銀蔵 YTM3ZGYw 書禁
2026-04-19 19:22:36
報告
【The security bills and China. How should we handle the threat from China?】

《The scenario in which the self defense force fights against China in the South China Sea》

It’s possible enough. Then the navy belonged to Philippine is so weak that the military force belonged to America will come to Philippine’s rescue. Then if the military force belonged to America has a fight against the one belonged to China, it’s possible Japan comes to America’s aid in the next time.

Or there is the possibility that both of the military force belonged to America and to China putting up the right of innocent passage in the high sea each other could fall into the military conflict in the South China Sea.

Either way, as the area is the important one where the sea lane goes through, the safety on the tanker carrying the natural gas or petroleum could be threatened, and energy may not have arrived Japan.

...もっと見る
返信 編集 削除
共感 2
No.23 燻し銀蔵 YTM3ZGYw 書禁
2026-04-19 19:45:09
報告
【The security bills and China. How should we deal with the threat from China?】

…and protects the warship belonged to the military force in America, as a result having a fight with the navy belonged to China. The scenario becomes realistic, but the judgement by the government is very hard to do.

Even if trying to quibble of could be cut the lifeline in Japan, there is stockpiling on the petroleum in Japan. Even if stopping the import of the petroleum for a year, there is enough stockpiling which we can endure for a year, so if the import of the petroleum stops for a while, can we say it’s the 存立危機事態?

Though we don’t exercise the right of collective self defense, judging it as 重要影響事態 and carry out the logistic support to the military force belonged to America. That kind of scenario is possible.

《Can we protect the Senkaku Island with the law this time?》

...もっと見る
返信 編集 削除
共感 2
No.24 燻し銀蔵 YTM3ZGYw 書禁
2026-04-19 20:09:12
報告
【The security bills and China. How should we handle the threat from China?】

《Can we protect the Senkaku Islands with the law this time?》

China sent ships around the sea area of the Senkaku Islands and made them invade the territorial sea or made them navigate near the place to the Senkaku Islands, so the attitude of China is as forceful as ever. If Japan lets its guard down even a little, the Senkaku Islands have may been occupied.

The Senkaku Islands are the territory belonged to Japan, so we the Japanese have to protect them, but are the security bills related to the Senkaku Islands? They have nothing to do with the Senkaku Islands obviously.

If being in emergency in the Senkaku Islands, the military force belonged to America comes to Japan’s rescue, or the military force belonged to America takes the initiative fighting against China. Lots of we the Japanese think like that, but it’s in the wrong.

...もっと見る
返信 編集 削除
共感 3
No.25 燻し銀蔵 YTM3ZGYw 書禁
2026-04-19 20:30:12
報告
【The security bills and China. How should we handle the threat from China?】

《Can we protect the Senkaku Islands with the law this time?》

It doesn’t always mean that the military force belonged to America comes to Japan so as to rescue us at once.

As long as China has the will of depriving us of the Senkaku Islands, though it must not exist, there is always possibility that the self defense force has a fight against the navy belonged to China, and then the self defense force is about to lose the fight, the military force belonged to America will come to Japan so as to support Japan.

Needless to say, America would say, it’s the thing on Japan’ own, so do it for yourself.

...もっと見る
返信 編集 削除
共感 3
No.26 燻し銀蔵 YTM3ZGYw 書禁
2026-04-19 21:07:57
報告
【The security legislations and China. How should we deal with the threat from Chins?】

《Can we protect the Senkaku Islands with the law this time?》

Lots of we the Japanese seem to assume when the military conflict breaks out at the Senkaku Islands, the military force belonged to America takes the field and fights against China, so we don’t have to be worried about it, but if so why does the self defense force exist?

The self defense force exists so as to protect the territory belonged to Japan, so first of all the members of the self defense force should fight and bleed. Protecting our territory means like that.

The security bills this time has nothing to do with the protection on the Senkaku Islands at all, but the Abe Prime Minister connected the security bills with the Senkaku Islands and responded to the questions, repeating invading by the government vessel belonged to China into the sea area around the Senkaku Islands in the South China Sea over and over again.

...もっと見る
返信 編集 削除
共感 4
No.27 あずき N2FhY2Iy 書禁
2026-04-19 21:12:04
報告
>>9
こんばんは。🌃

こちらのレスに返信してすみません。

え~と、これからスレを立ててみようかと思うのですが、

銀三さんに質問してすみません。🙏

ログインしようとすると、404とか出るので、銀三さんはログインしないままスレ立てられたのでしょうか?(^^ゞ
...もっと見る
返信 編集 削除
共感 1
No.28 燻し銀三 NmNiMzZm 書禁
2026-04-19 21:53:08
報告
ログインしようとすると、404と表示されるね、でもスレは建てられたよ😊

今は飲み始めたので、時間が経つにつれて、すぐには対応出来ないと思う😥

ごめんね💦
返信 編集 削除
共感 1
No.29 あずき N2FhY2Iy 書禁
2026-04-19 22:00:05
報告
>>28
了解しました。(*^^*)

私もここにスレ立てるのは初めてなので、上手くいきます様に、慎重にやってみますね。

銀三さんのところにレスさせていただき、雰囲気が解り、助かりました。🙏

ゆっくりお酒タイムをお過ごし下さいね。

(^_^)/~
返信 編集 削除
共感 1
No.30 燻し銀蔵 MzRhYjU0 書禁
2026-04-20 06:30:35
報告
【The security legislations and China. How should we deal with the threat from China?】

Neither the security bills are related to the 重要影響事態, PKO協力法, nor the 国際平和支援法.

But if Japan learns to be able to exercise the right of collective self defense, when America is attacked, Japan goes to America’s aid and exercise of the use of force, so the relationship of trust between Japan and America becomes deep.

As the relationship of trust between Japan and America becomes deep, and when being in emergency in Japan, America protects Japan seriously. As a result, the deterrent power against China is heightened. That kind of aspect may have been.

《Even if being the security bills Japan and America, we aren’t able to feel relieved 》

...もっと見る
返信 編集 削除
共感 4
No.31 燻し銀蔵 MzQzMWU5 書禁
2026-04-28 02:32:35
報告
【The security bills an and China. How should we handle the threat from China?】

Furthermore, the President Obama said the article 5 on the security legislation between Japan and America is able to be applicable to all the area under the administration by Japan including the Senkaku Islands. It doesn’t always mean he said the Senkaku Islands belong to the integral part of Japan.

Without referring to the territory belonging to which nation, it’s under the administration of Japan, the place where the authority of Japan extends, so America will protect Japan in emergency. America isn’t involved in the fact the territory belongs to which nation. It’s the stance on America.consisting with the request to Japan against the report of the Armitatege-Nye.

It means no sooner China had occupied the Senkaku Islands than the islands are under control by
China, so the military force in America may not have got involved in it, so Japan is forced to
fight against China with the right of individual self defense and to get back the islands from China then.

...もっと見る
返信 編集 削除
共感 2
No.32 燻し銀蔵 MzQzMWU5 書禁
2026-04-28 08:14:21
報告
【Japan does everything whatever America says in the security bills? As to the trust in the international society】

《Demands on Japan in the report of Armitage-Nye》

They used to be the political scientists and acted as the Deputy Under Secretary of State at the time of the Carter government, acted as the Assistant Secretary of State at the time of the Clinton Administration.

Both of two announced the policy proposal three times in 2000, in 2007, and in 2012 with the bipartisanship. It’s the report of Armitage-Nye.

When the third report was done in 2012, it became the topic of conversation among the people who were engaged in the national defense, but it wasn’t well known among ordinary people.

...もっと見る
返信 編集 削除
共感 2
No.33 燻し銀蔵 YTllMGMw 書禁
2026-04-28 10:43:01
報告
【Japan does everything whatever America says in the security bills? As to the trust in the international society】

《Demands on Japan in the report of Armitage-Nye》

They used to be the political scientists and acted as the Deputy Under Secretary of State at the time of the Carter government, acted as the Assistant Secretary of State at the time of the Clinton Administration.

Both of two announced the policy proposal three times in 2000, in 2007, and in 2012 with the bipartisanship. It’s the report of Armitage-Nye.

When the third report was done in 2012, it became the topic of conversation among the people who were engaged in the national defense, but it wasn’t well known among ordinary people.

...もっと見る
返信 編集 削除
共感 2
No.34 燻し銀蔵 MzQzMWU5 書禁
2026-04-28 16:59:06
報告
【Japan does everything whatever America says in the security bills? The trust in the international society】

《Demands on the report of Amritage Nye》

Japan should increase the observation on the South China Sea with America cooperatively so as to make assurance the free sail on the sea. The report says like that and it’s what the Abe government was about to carry out.

The emergency support and the business of the security safety are shown in the report, requesting Japan should protect ordinary people and the United Nations Peacekeeping Force with the armed force so as to fulfill the PKO.

The request that Japan should improve the legal capacity on the Ministry of Defense so as to protect the classified information between Japan and America has come true with the form of the Act on the Protection of Special Designated.

...もっと見る
返信 編集 削除
共感 2
No.35 燻し銀蔵 MzQzMWU5 書禁
2026-04-28 18:27:53
報告
【Japan does everything whatever America says in the security bills? The trust in the international society】

《The suggestion to Japan, 9items》

1 Restarting the cautious nuclear power generation is the right and responsible first step for Japan. The resume operation on the nuclear power generation is the only solution for Japan so as to come true the international commitment of reducing the global warming gas to 25% until 2020.

The fuel cost soars because of the strong yen and corporations depending on the energy continue to flow out from Japan, but restarting the nuclear power generation prevents it from happening, so it’s a wise plan.

Tokyo should play a leading role when designing a safe nuclear reactor and prompting sound regulation, being based on the lesson in Fukushima.

...もっと見る
返信 編集 削除
共感 2
No.36 燻し銀蔵 MzQzMWU5 書禁
2026-04-28 20:00:53
報告
【Japan does everything whatever America says in the security legislation? The trust in the international society】

《The suggestion to Japan, 9items》

6 Taking into account the new service and new mission, Japan should expand its responsibility which is imposed on itself, including defense for its own nation, and the area of defense which is done with America jointly,

The ability and the activity on the information, observation and reconnaissance which has mutual operability and more solid and is allocated evenly is indispensable which is over the territory of Japan in the alliance.

Allowing the full cooperation from the military force belonged to America and the self defense force through the step of the safety security from the peace time, being at the tension, or at the crisis, in the wartime is the part of the responsible authority of Japan.

...もっと見る
返信 編集 削除
共感 2
レス移動